it's admirable to see someone

it's admirable to see someone willing to be so passionate about the difference between "doesn't exist" and "Unlikely to exist."

I guess when it says, "The new measurements find 0.00±0.07 kilograms of dark matter in a volume the size of the Earth." some people will focus on the 0.00 and say "it doesn't exist," and others will focus on the +-0.07 and say, "see, it still might exist." That person becomes passionate about the possibility that there might be up to 70 grams in the volume the size of the Earth, because the test could not predict anything more accurate than that.

While the level of accuracy of any test is important, my choice is to focus on the 0.00 (Diablo iii Gold), move on and look elsewhere for the source of dark matter. While other scientists perfect the test to solve for the inaccuracy. If you're passionate about spending the time to find those .1 to 70 grams, then I look forward to seeing your paper on the subject. I'll even support you and help you find resources to make your case.

--- Your last statement makes me unsure you understand dark matter. (The following CAP WORDS are for emphasis only - I'm not yelling)

>>> The ONLY thing that says dark matter is there IS the gravity it produces (Diablo iii Gold). Gravity is the ONLY way we have to detect the existence of dark matter. Perhaps, I should have said, "it can't be detected in any OTHER way besides the gravity that it exerts on the stars of the galaxy."